Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) and desktop as a service (DaaS) seem incredibly similar. Both allow users to access virtual desktops, saving IT on installing and updating applications on all devices within the organization. If you look deeper into DaaS vs. VDI, you will find important differences, namely in administrative ownership and care needs. VDI is managed primarily within the data center located on the company’s premises, with distributed and internalized internal updates.
On the other hand, DaaS is a VDI type that is hosted in the cloud and hosted by an external company provider. There are different types of DaaS depending on the number of administrators uploaded, but the result allows the provider to stream visible desktops to the end user's client devices. Everything has its pros and cons, but it depends on the situation and our usage that it will be beneficial or not. We have added some differences between both VDI as a Service and DaaS to understand better.
Cost
Installing
servers or a data center to host and support your virtual desktops can cost a
lot of unembellished. On the other hand, if your workforce will remain
relatively similar in size for the foreseeable future, most costs should be
limited to expenses upfront. This could convert to savings in the long term. If
you download the VDI resource kit to learn more about VDI, it can help reduce
your costs before conducting VDI pricing comparisons.
Whereas
there can be some setup fees included with DaaS,
deployment generally requires a lower cost since the service provider delivers
the infrastructure. By doing a pay-per-use subscription model, organizations
can scale or change their investment as their needs evolve.
Flexibility and scalability
VDI
as a Services configuration and
alignment are generally tailored to an organization’s current needs. Because of
this, businesses that are constantly changing or growing may require more
alertness and scale than their on-premises VDI was established to
support.
Access to resources
VDI
deployment is based on a single employer model, meaning resources and
distribution are provided to a single organization. Because they do not share
servers with other organizations, there is no risk of disruption arising from
other users' needs.
With
DaaS, many services hire more people, which means you share resources with
other organizations, which can disrupt the service in the event of a
disruption. Some solutions, however, offer advanced options for reducing
resource downtime. Additionally, DaaS requires internet access which can affect
the access of other users or regions.
Wrapping up
Choosing
between VDI as a Service and DaaS may
be difficult, as the stakes are higher than ever for companies to adapt their
technology infrastructure to the remote-first world. If your company's growth
is stable and has a geographically centralized workforce, then you can choose VDI
as a Services. If you are looking for a more dexterous solution that
will future-proof your business, you can choose DaaS for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment